<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Natural Breast Enhancement Blog - Bountiful Breast &#187; Breast Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/category/breast-cancer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog</link>
	<description>Naturally Increase Your Breast Size - Bountiful Breast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Question: Can Bountiful Breast Stimulate Cancer Cells?</title>
		<link>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/breast-cancer/cancer-cells.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/breast-cancer/cancer-cells.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bountiful breast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[does it work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real Customer Email: &#8221; I have been interested in investing into a 13 month supply for several years now. The thought of stimulation of cancer cells that has me really &#8220;iffy&#8221; on getting this product and trying it out for myself. I have done a lot of research over the past couple years and this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Customer Email:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8221; <em>I have been interested in investing into a 13 month supply for several years now. The thought of stimulation of cancer cells that has me really &#8220;iffy&#8221; on getting this product and trying it out for myself. I have done a lot of research over the past couple years and this seems to be the most used and most effective product for breast enhancement. I know that I would be interested in the 13 month supply versus any other supply, and would like to pay it off at once. I have also talked to several agents working for Avalon and they have all expressed that no known case has ever come up with the product in particular with the issue about the stimulation of cancer cells, whether it be shown in results now or at an older age. This is the deciding factor for me&#8230;the price and the guarantee that it will not generate breast cancer cells. Any tips would be great. thank you</em>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Dear Miss,</p>
<p>Thank you for your email and questions, this should bring some relief to your concerns. Our company, unlike the other pill companies, is a real company doing real research, not a marketing mill. Our company is ran by a doctor who is an A4M member. <a href="http://www.worldhealth.net" target="_blank">www.worldhealth.net</a></p>
<p>Glandulars have never been implicated in cancer and they have been used for thousands of years. If you had cancer that was estrogen dependent and not all cancers are, then boosting your own hormones could theoretically speed up the growth of pre-existing cancer cells. Our product is a very low boost in hormones and also releases more progesterone &#8211; and progesterone prevents estrogen-induced cancer.</p>
<p>Your own natural healthy estrogen does not cause cancer &#8211; if you removed your own hormones from your body, you would die of cancer or heart disease. If you had an estrogen-dependent cancer and got pregnant, your pregnancy could kill you &#8211; because the body produces more estrogen when pregnant. This rarely happens to pregnant women but it has happened.</p>
<p>Cancer is a complex subject and avoiding cancer is not very well explained by the medical community. They tell you things like: &#8220;eat more vegetables and stay thin&#8221;.</p>
<p>We live in a sea of toxins that are a constant assault to the body causing oxidative stress and hormonal imbalance. Over exposure to toxins can cause your body can start producing estrogen referred to as &#8220;<strong>bad estrogen</strong>&#8221; &#8211; this happens when your liver is overloaded with PCB&#8217;s, pesticides, heavy metals, etc. The toxins make your liver conjugate estrogen down the wrong pathway in your liver. This is not to say bad estrogen is the sole cause of cancer because it is not.</p>
<p>Preventing cancer entails clearing toxins from the body and all its organs, as well as exercise, diet and weight management, hormone management, and using antioxidants, like glutathione and telomere, and protective supplements like resveratrol. You should also avoid products in plastic, cans, microwave oven usage, non-stick frying pans, dry cleaning clothes, canola oil (decreases ATP production in the mitochondria), fluoride, bromide in bread, chlorine in water, normal shampoo with SLS, preservatives, nail polish, body lotion, normal deodorant, being near emf-emitting devices, sleeping with wireless devices running, or using a cell phone. All substances &#8211; bromide, fluoride and chlorine &#8211; that displace iodine from your breasts and thyroid can cause cancer. Most people ingest these daily and have no idea they are poisoning themselves &#8211; and this probably the single highest risk factor you do to yourself everyday.</p>
<p>Cell phones are causing cancerous tumors on the nerves in people&#8217;s ears &#8211; it is called a bioaccoustic neuroma. Having clean air in your house and not living in a city are also cancer protective because our houses are full of chemicals that outgas and cities are full of pollution.</p>
<p>There are tests you can run to ascertain what cancer risk you have and things you can do to mitigate the possibility of ever getting cancer.<br />
You can check out <a href="http://www.metametrix.com" target="_blank"><strong>www.metametrix.com</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.breastcancercured.com" target="_blank"><strong>www.breastcancercured.com</strong></a> thermal imaging for breast cancer that shows precancerous cells up to 8 years in advance with no risks of radiation. They also treat cancer using radio waves that destroys the cancer with no side effects and is affordable.</p>
<p>* Estronex test for bad estrogen<br />
* Hair test for heavy metals</p>
<h2>The Estronex Profile measures six important estrogen metabolites, and ratios, including:</h2>
<h3>The &#8220;Good&#8221; Estrogen</h3>
<ul>
<li>2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) &#8211; high levels of 2-OHE1 are ideal to reduce cancer growth.</li>
<li>2-hydroxyestradiol (2-OHE2) &#8211; shown to exhibit anti-carcinogenic effects.</li>
<li>2-methoxyestrone (2-OMeE1) &#8211; OMeE1 has shown to have anticancer effects and is ideal in high levels.</li>
<li>4-methoxyestrone (4-OMeE1) &#8211; as a non-cancerous metabolite, OMeE1 generally does not require treatment at high levels in the body.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The &#8220;Bad&#8221; Estrogen</h3>
<ul>
<li>4-hydroxyestrone (4-OHE1) &#8211; considered a &#8220;bad&#8221; estrogen, 4-OHE1 levels should be low, as high levels may react negatively with damaged DNA.</li>
<li>16-α-hydroxyestrone (16α-OHE1) &#8211; also considered a &#8220;bad&#8221; estrogen, 16α-OHE1 in high levels may encourage tumor development.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Ratios</h3>
<ul>
<li>2-OHE:16α-OHE1 (2:16 ratio) &#8211; 2:16 ratios less than 2.0 indicate increasing long-term risk for breast, cervical, and other estrogen sensitive cancers. Importantly, nutritional interventions can help raise Estronex 2:16 ratios and decrease long-term risk. Studies also indicate that this risk is modifiable!</li>
<li>2-OHE1:2-OMeE1 &#8211; a high level of 2-OHE1:2-OMeE1 may also indicate imbalanced estrogen metabolism and low activity in the COMT gene. Evaluation of methylation activity is recommended.</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Toxicants and Detoxification tests:</strong></h3>
<ul>
<li>Porphyrins Profile &#8211; Urine</li>
<li>PCBs Profile &#8211; Serum</li>
<li>Chlorinated Pesticides Profile &#8211; Serum</li>
<li>Volatile Solvents Profile &#8211; Whole Blood</li>
<li>Phthalates &amp; Parabens Profile &#8211; Urine</li>
</ul>
<p>I would also check certain things that everyone is deficient in like B12, magnesium, and iodine.<br />
<a href="http://www.b12.com" target="_blank">www.b12.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.optimox.com" target="_blank">www.optimox.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.brianpeskin.com" target="_blank">www.brianpeskin.com</a></p>
<p>Essential fatty acid information and how the right efa&#8217;s stop you from getting cancer because the cell walls have the intregrity to hold 100% of the oxygen and oxygen rich environments stop cancer from proliferating.</p>
<p>So there is no one thing that you could ingest that is going to cause cancer. Cancer is a series of assaults from toxins, bacteria, fungus, and radiation that set the body up for DNA damage and disrepair, eventually resulting in cancer. A healthy body will not get cancer. Because some people have better methylation pathways, they are less apt to develop cancer as their bodies handle the daily deluge of chemicals they are exposed to.</p>
<h3><strong>To summarize, the answer to your question: no, taking our breast pill is not going to give you cancer now or in the future.</strong></h3>
<p>I&#8217;ll send you separately some amazing info on the connection found between breast cancer and root canals.</p>
<p>Yours truly<br />
<strong>Bountiful Breast</strong> <a href="http://www.bountifulbreast.com">Natural Breast Enlargement</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/breast-cancer/cancer-cells.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Found a Better way to protect myself against Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/breast-cancer/protect-myself-against-breast-cancer.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/breast-cancer/protect-myself-against-breast-cancer.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american cancer society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast implant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturopathic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survive breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early detection of breast cancer has not been early enough for many women who are faced with a life threatening diagnosis of breast cancer.  Women who are lucky enough to survive breast cancer often suffer greatly and struggle with the aftermath of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. What if there was a way to diagnose breast cancer years before the cancer cells appeared? If we could find precancerous cells we could take steps to stop the cancerous cells from developing into full blown cancer. Studies show that breast cancer treated in the earliest stages leads to cure rates of 95% or higher (2, 3). Good news there is a way, thermography! I have never gotten a mammogram, but I did get a thermography scan and I will keep getting them once a year. So far so good, I have no problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always feared getting a mammogram. I heard they hurt and they squish your breasts, can cause bruising and mammograms are x-rays, meaning radiation goes directly into your breasts and that can cause breast cancer.  Breasts are the most radiosensitive part of the body along with the thyroid.  A girlfriend of mine had a mammogram done and it caused her breast implant to rupture; it was an old silicone gel breast implant.  I won’t even get into what happened to her health and skin after that rupture, but she eventually had breast implant removal surgery and replaced the old implants with new <a href="http://www.bountifulbreast.com/faq.html#eighteen" target="_blank">saline breast implants</a>.</p>
<p>My naturopathic doctor advised me that mammograms are dangerous and he studied nuclear medicine at Duke University.  He said, “no radiation is safe radiation!” Despite the best intentions and research, breast cancer rates have continued to climb, how is that possible? We spend all this money on research and detection and keep getting sicker every year?</p>
<p>Early detection of breast cancer has not been early enough for many women who are faced with a life threatening diagnosis of breast cancer.  Women who are lucky enough to survive breast cancer often suffer greatly and struggle with the aftermath of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. What if there was a way to diagnose breast cancer years before the cancer cells appeared? If we could find precancerous cells we could take steps to stop the cancerous cells from developing into full blown cancer. Studies show that breast cancer treated in the earliest stages leads to cure rates of 95% or higher (2, 3). Good news there is a way, thermography! I have never gotten a mammogram, but I did get a thermography scan and I will keep getting them once a year. So far so good, I have no problems.</p>
<p><span id="more-120"></span></p>
<p>The North Carolina Institute of Technology has developed a QHM annual four phase physical exam that detects cancerous and precancerous cells and tumors and detects what they classify as a breast cancer connection between dental health and breast cancer.  Utilizing a form of thermography to analyze the breasts, face and other parts of the body, precancerous cells can be detected; leading to greatly increased chances of survival and less suffering.</p>
<p>Thermography is a thermal imaging scan that shows abnormal hot spots, hot spots show up in cancerous and pre cancerous cells and tumors. Preliminary testing of women showed that the hot spots that appeared on the scans turned up nothing during the biopsy, so this method of detection was abandoned. Researchers believed that thermal scans showed false positives and could not be relied upon to detect breast cancer.  Thermography was abandoned for mammography, a form of x-ray now it is too late to switch over, the medical establishment has a lot of money invested in mammograms and they seem to think the results are good enough.</p>
<p>Years later it was discovered that the false positive women did develop breast cancer up to seven years later!  Today there are many facilities throughout the country that perform thermal imaging to detect cancerous changes to a woman’s breasts. Thermal imaging has no risk or side effect, there are no x-rays, and the scan is fast, painless and safe. Unfortunately thermal imaging for the detection of breast cancer is not covered by most health insurance, so you must pay for your own thermography.  I think your health is worth spending the extra money on, if you don’t have your health you have nothing!</p>
<p>Every woman is at risk of developing breast cancer, and 1 in every 8 women in the United States will get breast cancer in her lifetime (1). Using the latest research you can protect yourself against this deadly disease and increase your odds of living of healthy, long life. Look into this life saving scan and take your friends and family along too!</p>
<p>You can learn more about QHM thermography by visiting <a href="http://breastcancercured.com" target="_blank">http://breastcancercured.com</a> and general thermography at <a href="http://www.breastthermography.com/" target="_blank">http://www.breastthermography.com/</a></p>
<p>REFERENCES</p>
<ol>
<li> American Cancer Society – Breast Cancer Guidelines and Statistics, 1999-2005</li>
<li> M. Gautherie, Ph.D.; Thermobiological Assessment of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1983; V 147, No. 8: 861-869.</li>
<li> 3. P. Gamigami, M.D.; Atlas of Mammography: New Early Signs in Breast Cancer. Blackwell Science, 1996.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bountifulbreast.com/blog/breast-cancer/protect-myself-against-breast-cancer.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

